Hi i had already mailed u that what kalki has written need not necessarily be history completely. n i will try n produce the exact woirdings of the kalvetu sometime later. also, please note that after he came to power, he has done a lot of good things n earned his name... but the fact is he had been part of the conspiracy. n pleae remember that there is no kalvettu to prove that senthan amudhan existed... the chola kalvettugal are so exhaustive at ;least as far as the ruling king is concerned. so if such a thing was there it would have been brought out in a kalvetu i guess.. will try n substantiate if i get more info... In the meanwhile please tell me if u r convinced..or not convinced..
I also think sendhan amudhan is a fictious character. One has to check the works done by vikraman too... Don't mistake me i am not a fan of vikraman's work... but there has been some research done by him and based on conversation with people who are still at it, it appears that sendhan amudhan is a fictious character and it is possible that kalki started with the story and had to change the course based on some later evidence...